Impedance and Current Threshold in Neurostimulation
Study Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments on the study
- This is an important study to be aware of when using a combined ultrasound and neurostimulation-guided peripheral block technique.
- It offers one possible explanation for why motor response may not be seen despite needle-nerve contact visualized on ultrasound. One area where we have frequently observed this is in the subgluteal sciatic region. Here the nerve is surrounded by muscle, which tends to have lower impedance according to this study, and hence may have a higher current threshold.
- The findings validate our current practice of using neurostimulation only to confirm the identity of a motor nerve. We do not seek a minimum current threshold as the endpoint for needle insertion, but rather look for needle-nerve contact.
- The results of this study also suggest that if a motor response is not obtained at high currents, one should try increasing the impulse duration from 0.1 to 0.3 msec. The authors reported a mean ratio of 1.82 for current thresholds obtained using 0.1 vs 0.3 msec impulse duration.