Systematic Review of US vs NS-Guided Nerve Blocks
Study Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments on the study
- This is one of the earliest systematic reviews / meta-analyses examining the question of whether ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blockade is superior to neurostimulation-guided techniques. As such it is an important paper to be aware of when following the literature on ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.
- Nevertheless, although the results of the meta-analyses suggest benefit of ultrasound-guidance with respect to block success, onset, duration and the risk of vascular puncture, it is important to bear in mind that there are methodological limitations. Firstly, only a small number of studies were included, especially for the individual outcomes that were considered. Secondly, there was significant clinical heterogeneity amongst the studies included (children vs adults, anatomical site of block, type and volume of local anesthetic used, neurostimulation technique, etc) and this limits the extent to which the findings can be generalized.
- Further randomized controlled trials are still needed to establish the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guidance compared to neurostimulation in peripheral nerve blockade. Future systematic reviews and meta-analyses should also seek to subgroup outcomes by the anatomical area / nerve being blocked.